I am purposefully brief in my posts. One: it makes for easier reading. Two: it makes for more frequent posts.

I am working out my thoughts that have been developed over several years, and sometimes I’ll write something that does not properly consider every angle. I expect to make mistakes. I think your label of inconsistent would be more accurately called underdeveloped. That’s what this blog helps me with.

Seriously, thank you!

There is a semantic issue that I’ve addressed some others here and elsewhere about a broad definition of homophobia that would include a person who believes that it is immoral. My argument is that such a definition is a shame because, like probably every homosexual, I hate the bigoted scum with the “G-d hates fags” signs or the people who beat up people because of their sexual orientation. I am not into the Taliban. Someone suggested heteronormative. I like it, but I don’t expect it to catch on.

As for having homosexuality erased, you are too quick to lump me together with a group to which I do not belong. My desire is not to get it erased. It is (yes, here is a view to my “agenda”) to stop pretending that it is normative, moral, a lifestyle choice, or an arrangement into which the word marriage should be applied.

Thank you for the comments.